Learn how small communities can leverage generative AI to simplify federal grant applications, streamline NOFO reviews, and manage reporting requirements. Practical tips for responsible AI use.
Partner:
By Pari Sabety and Saad Asad
In a recent webinar hosted by the Bloomberg Center for Public Innovation at Johns Hopkins University, experts explored how small communities can use AI to navigate the complex federal grants landscape. The session, "Responsible AI for Federal Grantwriting and Reporting," brought together:
As highlighted in the webinar, securing federal grants is a complex process for small communities with limited staff and resources. With sufficient support, these communities can access funding for essential projects that strengthen infrastructure, public services, and community resilience. Many towns need help navigating the confusing language, eligibility criteria, and reporting requirements tied to these grants. USDR’s “No Front Door” research highlighted key barriers these communities face and offered recommendations to make funding more accessible.
While many of these recommendations require more structural changes by the federal government, generative AI (gen AI) can help address some of these barriers and complement existing federal grant-seeking strategies. Of course, using gen AI comes with risks and tradeoffs that must also be assessed as you use the tools.
Based on USDR’s research, here are a few key challenges small communities face when applying for federal grants (find a more detailed review of the recommendations in the full report):
Small communities often need help to sift through and interpret multiple grant opportunities. Notices of Funding Opportunity (NOFOs)—the detailed documents that outline eligibility requirements and other grant details—can be lengthy and complex. With limited staff time, community leaders may struggle to review these opportunities thoroughly, leading to missed or unsuitable matches.
Successful grant applications require more than just eligibility; they also need a strong narrative and organized data to support the community’s needs. Many small towns lack the full-time staff needed to pull together these narratives and gather relevant data effectively.
After winning a grant, communities often face additional work in tracking and reporting on their use of funds. This administrative load can overwhelm small teams, leading some communities to opt out of applying altogether due to the long-term commitment.
Gen AI tools such as ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini offer practical ways to reduce some of the manual workload associated with these challenges. Prompting gen AI with the specific request can help simplify these reviews, the key is giving the tool direction for what to deliver.
NOFOs can be dense documents, often 40 to 100 pages long, filled with eligibility rules and technical requirements. For a community with limited staff, reading and analyzing these documents in detail is a significant challenge. Gen AI can help by scanning these documents and pulling out essential information, like eligibility criteria, deadlines, and funding amounts.
Creating a competitive grant application requires a clear narrative and well-organized data that align with the grant-making agency’s priorities. Gen AI can assist by gathering community demographics or statistics and organizing them in agency-friendly formats.
For awarded grants, reporting can be a substantial workload. Gen AI can structure data into compliant templates and draft progress reports, saving time and helping teams meet reporting standards.
While gen AI offers clear benefits in simplifying certain grant-related tasks, it also comes with limitations and risks. Here’s what communities must keep in mind:
Data privacy: Gen AI tools may retain input data, so it’s essential to avoid including sensitive or personally identifiable information. Anonymizing data wherever possible helps protect community privacy and minimizes security risks.
Potential for bias: Gen AI models are built on large datasets that may contain inherent biases. To ensure fair representation of community needs, it’s important to review AI-generated content carefully, especially in sections discussing community impact or project goals.
Human oversight is essential: While gen AI can handle data organization and draft narratives, complex tasks—such as budgeting, policy alignment, or meeting specific legal requirements—require human review. Gen AI is a support tool, not a replacement, and its outputs should always be refined by grant writers and city leaders to ensure accuracy and alignment with grant-making agency expectations.
Gen AI offers practical advantages for small communities, particularly by reducing the workload associated with reviewing NOFOs, organizing application data, and handling compliance reports. However, it is most effective as part of a balanced toolkit that includes human expertise, traditional grant management practices, and careful manual review. When used thoughtfully, gen AI can help communities make the grant process more manageable, improving their chances of accessing funds that support growth and resilience.
At USDR, our mission is to support responsible technology adoption that enhances government effectiveness. Through our partnership with Google.org, we’re piloting gen AI solutions to streamline public-sector processes while upholding community values. To learn more about USDR’s work, contact us.